Canon G11 Prices, Reviews, Sales, Compare
 |
Canon G11 Prices, Reviews, Sales, Compare.
Product: Canon G11 Amazon Price: Too low to display Availability: In Stock |
I actually calm shoot film the titanic majority of the time however I purchased my mother a G-10 for her birthday last year and spent a couple weeks using the camera so I could adequately train her how to exhaust it. I have since borrowed it on numerous occasions and was actually about to rob my enjoy G-10 but then I heard about the G-11 so I figured I would wait and bewitch the modern upgraded version. I am tickled I did honest that. For me this camera is worth upgrading to unbiased for the swivel LCD thought veil on the encourage. I cant explain you how many times I have shot outdoors and was completely unable to view the LCD shroud even when you black it with one of your hands. Adding the swivel option basically eliminates this quandary. This option is so nice when shooting outdoors that I am honestly thinking about upgrading my mothers camera for this one reason alone as she doesn't have the best eyesight which means if I am having problems seeing the viewfinder, I can only imagine how hard it is for her to gawk it.
The next best thing I have noticed about this camera is its improved film bustle ratings. I have already done a lot of testing with the G-11 and to say that they have improved the bustle ratings is a stout understatement especially in the higher film rush settings. I was extremely hesitant to consume a film urge over 400 with the G-10 yet I am using speeds above 800 with the G-11. Depending on the conditions your shooting in you should glimpse anywhere from a 1.0 to 2.0 discontinuance disagreement. I did some tests where the G-11 shot pictures at 800 that were basically equivalent to a 200 on the G-10. I was hoping for an improvement in this spot but wasn't expecting this broad of an improvement.
The next biggest improvement has to be with the auto mode. I tested the auto mode extensively with the G-10 as that was going to be the mode my mother stale the most, at least out of the gate, and I was unimpressed. There were too many shooting situations to count that easily fooled the camera into shooting with settings that were less than optimal. You would quiet score decent results but it definitely needed improvement and they have done impartial that. Running the identical tests I did with the G-10 clearly showed that this camera is grand better at selecting the appropriate shooting mode. Some conditions were drastic improvements. This is probably the 2nd biggest reason why I am most likely going to be upgrading my mothers camera to a G-11.
A lot of people were concerned with the G-11 as it actually has a smaller report size than the G-10. The G-10 has a 14.7 MP size and the G-11 only has a 10 MP size. Overall that's a 32% decrease in maximum size. People who have a high view of digital imaging sensors knew not to anguish as the MP size is not the most distinguished aspect to an imaging chip. Details such as dynamic range, image noise and low-light performance are fair as well-known, if not more notable, when discussing overall image quality. I for one have always hated the MP war as we passed the quality that the immense majority of the population would be remark with a long time ago. It has basically become a numbers game where people mediate that bigger is better and they fair don't seem to remove that they will never have any utilize for such high MP images. So I tip my hat to Canon for taking this extremely valiant step as this is the FIRST time that we have seen resolution reduced in a line of cameras that is calm progressing forward. IMO this is the white flag that signifies the war of the MP is finally coming to an kill and we will finally peep companies focused on these other, equally famous, image qualities as considerable as they have been with the MP size. As for the image quality of the current sensor, its outstanding! I immediately noticed a incompatibility in the overall quality of the images. They seem richer with great less compression on the higher and lower ends. If I had the choice of choosing between the G-10 sensor and the G-11 sensor I would assume the G-11 sensor every single time. Again a mountainous tip of the hat to Canon for boldly choosing to go this route with the G-11 sensor.
The G-11 retains the same 5x optical zoom lens from the G-10 which in case your unaware is equivalent to a 28mm to 140mm lens. Also the same is the aperture settings which go from f/2.8 to f/4.5 depending on the zoom setting. Shutter speeds range from 1/4,000 to 15 seconds and it has the same metering modes as the G-10 (evaluative, center-weighted and set) . Thankfully they didn't form any changes to the manual dials at the top of the camera as that is easily one of my current aspects to these cameras. ISO hasten and the camera mode dials let you hasty and easily switch the most critical settings. I an an worn school photographer so I collected remove dials to buttons. IMO its the best station up out of all the point and shoots on the market.
2 other noticeable improvements include an increased flash sync urge of 1/2000 and a high-definition HDMI connector (Dont misfortune it quiet has the USB 2.0 connection) .
The bottom line is that Canon has taken the G-10, which was easily one of the best point and shoots on the market, and made some outstanding improvements that have taken this camera line to a whole modern level. If your one of those people who care more about how many MPs your camera has than the steady image quality of the camera then you should stick with the G-10. If however you are more concerned with image quality than MP's then plunge what your doing, list your G-10 on eBay and accelerate out and select the G-11. The image quality, improved noise performance, and swivel abet LCD camouflage perform this camera absolutely worth every penny.
The only negative thing I can say about this camera is in regards to Canon's sheer ignorance when it comes to the lack of standard size filter threads. How hard would it be to execute this camera so it had a 52 or 58mm threaded lens opening? Trust me when I relate you it would be extremely easy. At the very least they could execute it so all you needed was a simple step up ring to 52mm or 58mm. Instead they leave out threads altogether and obtain you go out and exercise around a hundred bucks on a 3rd party aluminum lens tube that then allows you to exhaust 58mm and 72mm filters. The "Plastic" Canon Lens tube isn't even an option as its so poorly designed. It unbiased really annoys me that canon totally ignores this aspect of this camera. In all honesty threaded lens openings should be mandatory for all cameras, even point and shoots. Again it would be EXTREMELY Easy to change.
Overall the G-11 is simply an extraordinary, must hold, camera.
5 Stars!!
Edit......
The more I opinion about it the more I idea I should arrive on here and be more specific in regards to the lens tube divulge. While Amazon will not allow me to write the name of the company that makes the aluminum lens tube that people should take if they want to consume filters with the G-10 or G-11, I can however be specific in regards to which one you absolutely should not remove which ironically is the one made by Canon. The lens tube that you should finish away from is the LA-DC58K Lens Adapter and here is a link to that item.
Canon LA-DC58K Conversion Lens Adapter for Canon G10 Digital Cameras
There are multiple problems with the LA-DC58K. First its plastic which means the overall quality is considerable lower than the other options on the market, besides plastic threads are never a beneficial thought as they wear down with time making it harder and harder to properly screw things in as it ages. This simply doesn't happen with brass or aluminum threads. The biggest dilemma with the LA-DC58K is that it doesn't fit soundly on the camera. Once installed it should be 100 movement free, in other words it should have a nice sound fit and that fair isn't what you rep with the LA-DC58K. It rattles around and is completely unstable once fitted in the camera and this is simply inexcusable. As if this wasn't enough you also come by severe vignetting at wide angles and the tube isn't long enough thus it restricts burly zoom ability. I honestly have absolutely no clue how this accessory was allowed to go to market in its novel condition.
I know it may seem incredible that Canon could construct an accessory for one of its flagship models that has this many problems but acquire it as everything I wrote is 100% just. I am one of the dejected people that ordered the LA-DC58K. It was absolutely repugnant and was boxed up and returned after less than an hour of exercise. Its a shame that I cant give the name of the company that makes the aluminum version but since its not sold on Amazon its against their policy to list it. Objective Google "Aluminum lens tube canon G10" and you should easily rep the company that produces it.
I hope this helps!
I've only owned a G11 since this morning but was compelled to write this review for two reasons. First, I am amazed at how well Canon listened to their customer irascible. People loved the G10 ( and I notion on keeping the one I've been shooting for the last year....) But the two biggest complaints/suggestions I've routinely heard are: 1. The high ISO noise is too clear and noise filters blur the image. 2. I wish it had a flexible conceal on the benefit. To those two complaints I would have added: It would be nice to have a better optical concept finder with more suitable framing.
We all hoped that they wouldn't change the things that everyone liked such as the astounding analog controls on the top of the G10.
So, I now have camera that IS really about a terminate and a half or two stops more sensitive. 400 on the G11 looks better than 200 on the G10. I'd acquire the camera unbiased for that. Secondly, the cover on the abet now swivels. Nope, the viewfinder didn't gather improved.
What you are getting is a really nicely made camera that is convenient to carry around (but not really pocketable) that works expeditiously and well and is getting into the quality location that frail to be the sole provence of DSLR cameras. You also gather a nice movie mode (640, not HD) which works well for web projects as well as a camera with smaller file sizes than it's predecessor. It is 10 megs versus 15. Another reviewer griped that the G11 should have had a longer zoom and 24 megapixels. I don't want either of those things because I understand the greater the range of the zoom lens the less well it can be corrected for optical faults. I don't want more megapixels because 99% of what I print is 12 by 18 inches or smaller and both cameras will already do that very well if you practice grand technique. There are plenty of long zoom range cameras that work well for snapping your kids playing soccer. I have a Canon SX20 that does a righteous job with that. But there are few microscopic cameras that are both fun to shoot snappily, on the street and it available light situations that also yield really nice files. This camera is one of them. We should give a few kudos to Canon for getting rev2 (actually rev 
true for what we really like to do as photographic artists.
I hope someone writes a really noble book about using cameras in this class.
Also thrilled that Canon uses the same battery between the G10 and the G11.
Added last night: I went out shooting in the soft rain and dim half light yesterday afternoon/evening. I faded the camera at ISO 400 and 800 and shot as shameful as 1/25th of a second. The images did not have a lot of noise and the IS worked very well. If you've shot with Canon's previous powershot cameras you will score aged to the controls and menus very expeditiously.
Before Canon's latest release, I archaic a G10 as my compact camera. I bought both the S90 and G11 the first weekend they were available and have been comparing both of them to the G10 for the past couple weeks. I have taken hundreds of images using all 3 cameras side by side with the same settings. The title of "Best Compact" has been debated feverishly on the web, with most votes going to the G10 and LX3. But now, I mediate Canon's unusual release of both the S90 and G11 will build a snappily ruin to these debates. There is no expect in my mind that this pair sits above all competitors. All three of these Canon cameras serve from the ability to shoot raw format and the 1/1.7" sensor, which is larger than the 1/2.3" sensor found in most other compact cameras.
G11 vs. G10
The first thing I wanted to test was image quality and noise at high ISO settings. Most photography hobbyists and pros know that obscene light performance is the number one factor influencing camera and lens prices. This is the main reason an f/2.8 zoom lens costs 3-5 times as worthy as an f/3.5-5.6 zoom. The G11 performs superbly in this regard. RAW images from the G11 station at ISO 800 were equal to or better than RAW images from the G10 site at ISO400. Both luminance and chrominance noise were lower in the G11 images. This represents a 1 halt improvement, which is what I was hoping for. These comparisons were made with all noise reduction disabled in camera and in the DPP software. I tested all other ISOs and found the G11 to be better at all ISO settings above 100 and the 2 cameras demonstrated equal IQ at the snide ISOs of 80 and 100.
The feel of the G11 is almost identical to the G10. The biggest dissimilarity is that the G11 now has an articulating LCD compared to the fixed LCD on the G10. To accommodate the original LCD mount, the relieve of the camera was slightly redesigned. The succor is now plastic instead of metal, the shortcut and play buttons are now slightly harder to arrive, and the rear control dial is both smaller and has a cheaper feel. These differences are immediately apparent to someone who has ancient the G10 extensively, but I query the camera will feel unbiased blooming to everyone else. I deem most people would agree that the articulating LCD is worth giving up a slight bit of the solid feel.
I went step-by-step through the menus and features of both cameras during my comparison and most functions are very similar. One of the unique features I really like is the ability to sparkling tune the WB. So if you derive the auto white balance tends to speed too warm for your tastes, honest dial it cooler and it will adjust each WB calculation by the amount you specify.
G11 vs. S90
Both these cameras have the same modern sensor, so obscene light performance is identical. Canon also boasts about the S90 having a faster f/2.0 lens compared to the f/2.8 on the G10, but this portion of the camera did not imprint me. The lens only has the 1-stop advantage at the absolute widest setting and the max aperture closes down quickly from there. The G11 lens is faster at the telephoto extinguish and the dissimilarity is negligible at all zoom settings in between. Both lenses are equally consuming throughout their zoom ranges. The G11 has a hot shoe, but when I want to consume external flashes, I dial-down the on-board flash and exhaust it to trigger remotes.
The ergonomics of the G11 and S90 are the biggest contrast. I wanted to try the S90 because it boasts of equal image quality to the G11 in a smaller, lighter package. After using the S90, I judge it might fair be too cramped for my hands. On the G11, I can operate all of the controls on the right-rear of the camera with the thumb of the hand holding the camera. With the S90 there are fewer controls that I can operate one-handed and at times I feel like I might tumble it, because I fair can't pick up a kindly grip on it. The rear control ring on the S90 turns too easily and I have found myself unintentionally adjusting settings because of this, which was never a quandary on the G10.
Bundled Software
The camera ships with a newer version (3.7) of Canon's Digital Photo Professional software. There is not great disagreement compared to older versions, but there is one nice improvement: the lens aberration part is enabled for images taken with the G11. This allows for correction of vignetting, CA and distortion. I do not understand why the same controls are not available for RAW files taken with the G10. There is composed no straighten function in the software, which is a disappointment. Another disappointing factor about the software is that Canon has not yet released a recent RAW Codec; the unique version (1.5) does not aid the S90 or G11. This allows raw files to be viewed in Windows and for thumbnail images to be created in Windows explorer. I am definite they are working on an update, but I wish they had this ready by the time the camera was released.
Summary
If you are considering upgrading from a G10 to a G11, I say "Go for it". With the exception of the cheaper feel on the abet of the camera, there is nothing I can judge of that is not equal or better on the G11. Most importantly the image quality is better.
If you are trying to choose between a G11 and S90, I recommend you try them out in the store and watch which one feels better to you. I collected have them both and do not yet know which I will be keeping.
The G11 is an profitable camera and I highly recommend it.
